Provisional Patent Application Requirements for Software, Algorithms & MVPs (DIY Guide)

Provisional Patent Application Requirements for Software, Algorithms & MVPs (DIY Guide)

Return to Blog Homepage

If you are filing a provisional patent application for a software invention—especially at the MVP or early startup stage—you may be wondering what is actually required. Do you need source code? How detailed must your algorithm be? What system components must be described? This guide explains the practical requirements for preparing a software provisional patent application, with a focus on algorithms, MVPs, and early-stage implementations.

Drafting a patent application for a software or computer-implemented invention is very different from drafting other types of patent applications, such as those for mechanical devices or consumer products. Software involves algorithms, data processing steps, distributed systems, API interactions, and user experiences. Because of this complexity, many pro se inventors struggle to determine what level of detail is required and how to structure the description.

This guide explains the major components that should be included in most types of software patent applications. It is designed to help inventors prepare their own application—especially those filing a provisional patent application with United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) as a first step. While drafting a strong provisional patent application requires careful thought, the process becomes clearer once you understand how software inventions should be described to afford the maximum amount of protection for the invention.

This article addresses the following topics:

If you want to avoid spending days writing, or if you are unsure what content is required, you can consider using Idea2PatentAI. Our AI-powered patent drafting platform can automatically generate a structured software patent application tailored to your specific technology.

For more information on drafting provisional applications, you can visit our articles below:

Provisional Patent Application Requirements for Software, Algorithms, and MVPs {#provisional-requirements}

When filing a provisional patent application for a software invention, the goal is not to produce a finished, production-ready specification. Instead, the goal is to disclose the invention in sufficient technical detail so that the subject matter you later claim is entitled to the provisional's priority date.

While requirements vary by invention, most software-based provisional patent applications—particularly those covering algorithms, platforms, or MVPs—should include the elements outlined below.

What Is Required

At a minimum, a software provisional patent application should disclose:

  • A technical explanation of how the invention works, not just what it does or the business problem it addresses
  • Step-by-step method descriptions explaining how data is processed, analyzed, transformed, or acted upon
  • Descriptions of key algorithms, rules, or decision logic, expressed at a functional and technical level
  • System architecture descriptions identifying major software components, modules, or services and how they interact
  • Hardware context, including at least a general explanation of processors, memory, and computing devices that execute the software

These disclosures are critical to satisfying the enablement requirement and ensuring that later-filed claims are fully supported by the provisional application.

What Is Not Required

Many first-time inventors overestimate what must be included in a software provisional patent application. In most cases, you do not need to provide:

  • Actual source code
  • Fully tested and workable prototypes
  • Production-ready UI designs or polished screen mockups
  • Complete database schemas
  • Deployment-specific implementation details

Instead, the focus should be on core functional and technical behavior, described clearly and thoroughly enough that a skilled practitioner could implement the invention without undue experimentation.

Special Considerations for MVP-Stage Inventions

If your invention is still at the MVP or prototype stage, your provisional patent application can—and should—reflect that reality. An MVP-stage application often relies on:

  • Conceptual architectures rather than finalized implementations
  • Representative examples or use cases instead of full feature sets
  • Descriptions of alternative implementations or variations that have not yet been built

However, even at the MVP stage, you must still describe the core functional and technical mechanisms underpinning the invention in sufficient detail. A provisional application that merely describes goals, outcomes, or high-level ideas—without explaining how those results are achieved—may fail to support claims that are included in a later-filed non-provisional (which could result in the loss of the provisional application's priority date).

How Detailed Must My Description Be? Understanding the Enablement Requirement (35 U.S.C. § 112) {#enablement}

One of the most basic rules in U.S. patent law is the enablement requirement under 35 U.S.C. §112. In simple terms:

Your patent application must contain enough detail to teach someone in the field how to make and use the invention without undue experimentation.

While you do not need to disclose actual source code, you must describe the inventive concept at a technical level, not merely a business, economic, or administrative level.

The exact details that need to be included in your software patent will vary depending on your specific invention. However, for many software patent applications, you should consider including:

  • A technical explanation of how the system works
  • Descriptions of methods or process flows
  • Hardware and device descriptions
  • A system architecture description
  • Data flow and network interactions
  • Examples, use cases, or sample operating scenarios
  • Explanations of any algorithms, rules, models, or heuristics used

These standard components of a software patent application are discussed in further detail below.

Why Enablement Matters for Provisional Patent Applications

A provisional patent application only protects what is actually disclosed. The priority date of your provisional will not extend to subject matter that is not described in your application.

If you later file a non-provisional application with broader or more detailed claims that were not fully supported in the provisional, you risk:

  • Losing your priority date for those claims
  • Invalidating the patent because the new material was not supported
  • Allowing competitors to patent around you

Therefore, even when filing a provisional, you must treat your drafting seriously and include robust detail.

Providing a thorough description now can save you from costly problems later—especially when software claims must be supported by explicit method steps, system behavior, or descriptions of underlying technical features.

Method Descriptions & Process Flow Narratives: The Core of Any Software Patent Application {#method-descriptions}

Software, at its core, is a sequence of data processing steps, user actions, and system responses. Because of this, method descriptions are the heart of any software patent application.

Most pro se inventors fail in this section. They describe the goal or outcome of the software—but not how it does it.

Statements like:

  • "The system uses AI to identify fraud"
  • "The platform optimizes sales performance"
  • "The software automatically categorizes user inputs"

…are not enough.

Rather, a stronger software patent application will describe the step-by-step method(s) of how the above goals or outcomes are achieved. In drafting the descriptions of these methods, you should consider highlighting:

  • Key analysis steps
  • Data transformations
  • Decision logic
  • Calculations, comparisons, scoring methods
  • Algorithmic rules
  • Backend processing sequences

In most software patent applications, this is where most of the patent value lies.

A strong software patent application typically describes multiple methods, not just one.

Below are the most common types of methods that are included in software patent applications. You should assess whether some or all these apply to your invention.

If you are unsure about which methods to include in your software application, you should consider using Idea2PatentAI. Idea2PatentAI's patent drafting platform conducts an AI-powered review of your invention to detect the particular types of methods that apply, and automatically drafts a step-by-step description of each method.

A. Methods Describing System-Level Behavior

Usually, a software application should describe a system-level method or process flow that describes:

  • How the overall system operates
  • How components interact
  • How data flows between modules
  • How backend processes transform or analyze data

This is type of system-level method is often useful to provide support for broad system claims.

Example for "Methods Describing System-Level Behavior"

To make this more concrete, consider a software invention that analyzes user behavior across an e-commerce platform to generate personalized product recommendations. In this example, the steps of a system-level method may include descriptions of:

  • User Access Step: Users access an e-commerce platform stored on a web server over a network, such as the Internet, using mobile apps or web browsers installed on user devices, such as a smart phones or desktop computers.
  • Receive Event Data Step: A backend event-tracking module of the e-commerce platform receives user interaction data (e.g., page views, clicks, search queries) from the users.
  • Normalize Step: A data ingestion component normalizes the event data by timestamp, user ID, device ID, and session metadata, then stores the processed records in a behavioral analytics database.
  • Aggregate User Profiles Step: A profile construction engine retrieves historical behavioral records and aggregates them into a unified "user behavioral vector" representing browsing frequency, preferred categories, peak browsing times, and purchase history.
  • Generate Recommendations Step: A recommendation engine applies a machine-learning model to the behavioral vector, along with real-time inventory and pricing data, to generate a ranked list of recommended products.
  • Transmit Results Step: The server hosting the e-commerce platform transmits the ranked recommendation list to the user devices.
  • Interaction Tracking Step: A monitoring subsystem tracks whether the users interact with the recommendations. For each recommendation list sent to a user device, the monitoring subsystem records each recommendation viewed, selected, and purchased by each user.

B. Methods for Specific Components

In many software patent applications, the invention includes certain key components that are the heart of the invention. For example, these key components may be a decision engine, an artificial intelligence (AI) module, an analysis function, or other software-implemented component the invention believes is novel.

It is strongly recommended that you build out separate component-level methods for each important component of your software system. Each component-level method can drill down on how the component operates and functions. Amongst other things, the methods may highlight:

  • Each step the component performs
  • Inputs received by the component
  • Decision criteria or analysis functions employed by the component
  • The outputs generated by the component

Example Component-Level Method Description

Consider the above example of the e-commerce platform that generates personalized product recommendations. In this example, the most important component of the system is likely the recommendation engine and an inventor would therefore want to include a step-by-step method of how this component functions, and the steps of this component-level method may include:

  • Receive Feature Input Data Step: The recommendation engine receives a behavioral feature vector generated by upstream modules. The feature vector may include one or more of: normalized page-view counts, clickstream histories, product-category preferences, dwell-time measurements, search-query frequencies, and recent purchase indicators. The engine may also receive supplemental product metadata and inventory data from the product database.
  • Pre-Process Inputs Step: The engine standardizes the input values by scaling numerical fields, encoding categorical fields, and applying recency-weighting factors. The engine may augment the input with derived attributes, such as session-activity scores, engagement-depth indicators, or category-specific interest weights.
  • Apply ML Model to Score Candidates Step: The engine executes a trained machine-learning model that evaluates the feature vector against a candidate set of products. The model may include a collaborative-filtering layer, a neural-network scoring layer, or a matrix-factorization module. For each candidate product, the engine computes a relevance score, confidence value, or predicted-engagement probability.
  • Rank and Filter Results Step: The engine sorts the scored products in descending order based on their computed relevance values. It may apply filtering rules to remove out-of-stock items, duplicate products, restricted categories, or items below a minimum confidence threshold. The engine may also apply business logic or weighting factors (e.g., inventory turnover rates, promotional priorities).
  • Generate and Transmit Recommendation Output Step: The engine formats the ranked products into a structured recommendation object (e.g., JSON), which includes product identifiers, relevance scores, confidence indicators, and timestamp metadata. The output object is transmitted to the application server or directly to the client-facing interface through an API endpoint.

In many applications, there may be more than one software component that is deemed to be important or that contributes to the novelty of the invention. In this scenario, you will likely want to add a component-level method for each such component.

C. Methods for User Interactions

Many software inventions involve interactions with end-users and, therefore, adding descriptions of user-based methods can be important. These methods usually describe how a device, such a smartphone or desktop computer, operated by a user experiences the invention.

Some software inventions involve multiple categories of users (e.g., sales team users vs marketing team users or customer users vs. system administrator users), each interacting with the system in different ways and performing distinct actions. Because each user type may initiate different workflows, trigger different backend processes, or access different interface elements, your patent application should include separate method descriptions for each relevant user role.

When drafting methods from the perspective of different user types, consider describing:

  • The user's starting context
  • Inputs or actions specific to that user
  • User interfaces presented to the user
  • System responses triggered by the User
  • Outputs presented to the user

Example of User-Based Method

Again, consider the above example of the e-commerce platform that generates personalized product recommendations. In this example, an inventor would want to include a step-by-step method of how a customer interacts with the e-commerce platform, and the steps of this user method may include:

  • User Access Step: The user opens a client-facing application (e.g., mobile app or web browser) and is presented with a product interface that includes various types of products.
  • Browse Content Step: The user scrolls through product listings, selects categories, performs searches, or views product-detail pages. Each action generates one or more behavioral events (e.g., page views, clicks, or search queries) captured by the client application.
  • Send Interaction Data: The client application transmits user-interaction events—such as category selections, item views, search terms, and engagement durations—to the backend event-tracking server via a secure API.
  • Receive Recommendations Step: After backend processing (including the component-level steps described previously), the client application receives a structured recommendation object containing a ranked list of products, each associated with relevance and confidence indicators.
  • Render Recommendations Step: The client application displays the recommended items to the user within the interface. Recommendations may be shown as a carousel, a "Recommended for You" module, or an updated listing of personalized results.
  • Capture Follow-On Interactions Step: The user may view one of the recommended items, click on alternative suggestions, add items to a cart, or refine search filters. Each of these follow-on actions generates additional behavioral events for further processing.

Hardware Component Descriptions (Requirements of Bilski v. Kappos) {#hardware-components}

A common—and fatal—mistake made by inventors drafting software patents is failing to describe the hardware that implements the software.

The 2010 Supreme Court decision in Bilski v. Kappos was an important decision that continues to impact the way software patent applications are drafted. In general, the result of this decision requires software patent applications to include certain types of hardware descriptions as a basic threshold requirement. In practical terms, your application should explain:

  • ✔ What hardware devices execute the software of the invention
  • ✔ How software instructions are stored on a memory device
  • ✔ How a processor executes the instructions stored on the memory device
  • ✔ Examples of how the system is implemented (e.g., cloud server, mobile device, edge device)

To satisfy these requirements, patent attorneys who regularly operate in the software patent space typically inject several pages of "boilerplate" content they have developed over the course of many years into software patent applications. This boilerplate content injected into the patent application usually provides broad support for various types of hardware devices that can be utilized to execute the software described in the application and, in many cases, describes:

  • Memory devices (e.g., RAM, ROM, flash memory)
  • Processor devices (e.g., CPUs, GPUs, microprocessors, ASICs)
  • Storage media (e.g., SSDs, databases, cloud storage)
  • Input/output interfaces
  • General-purpose vs. special-purpose computing devices

Even if this seems obvious, omitting these details can be detrimental and will often necessitate a patent examiner to automatically reject a patent application that does not include support for these basic hardware descriptions.

If you are drafting a patent application on your own, it may be helpful to review several well-drafted software patent applications to understand the "boilerplate" hardware descriptions that patent attorneys routinely include to satisfy the requirements of the Bilski decision. You can then adapt this language to fit your specific invention, tailoring it as needed to accurately describe the computing environment used to implement your system.

If you are unsure about how to draft these hardware descriptions in your patent application, you should consider using Idea2PatentAI. When Idea2PatentAI's automated patent drafting platform detects an invention that involves software, it automatically inserts a corresponding hardware description into the patent application to help ensure that the above requirements are satisfied.

System Architecture Description {#system-architecture}

Software is often implemented as interconnected components rather than a single monolithic block. Therefore, supplementing your software patent application with a description of the system architecture can be important to satisfy enablement requirements and ensure the invention is thoroughly described.

While the specific architecture can vary from invention to invention, below are some common examples of architecture components that you can consider describing in your application.

A. Logical System Blocks

Identify and describe each significant logic component of your system.

Examples:

  • Authentication module
  • Data ingestion module
  • API gateway
  • Machine learning engine
  • Reporting dashboard
  • User interface module
  • Notification engine
  • Database engine

Describe what each does, what inputs it receives, and what outputs it provides.

B. Client/Server Interactions

If your software includes backend services, cloud components, SaaS (software-as-a-service) platforms, or mobile/web clients, describe:

  • How the mobile app communicates with the server
  • What data is sent from client → server
  • How the server processes requests
  • How the server responds to the client

C. API Relationships

If your system uses application programming interfaces (APIs) to streamline or standardize communications between two or system components:

  • Describe each relevant API
  • Explain what parameters they accept
  • Identify returned data objects
  • Identify the system component (e.g., server) that stores the API
  • Identify the devices (e.g., user devices) that communicate with the component

D. Data Sources

Most software inventions typically leverage databases for various purposes. At a minimum, an invention typically utilizes a database to store data that is generated by the invention or to facilitate interactions with end-users. In some cases, an invention also may access third-party databases (e.g., databases that stored financial, weather, security, or other information) to aid the invention in performing its function.

  • Describe the contents or data included in each database with specificity
  • If applicable, describe what data is saved to the database by the invention
  • If applicable, describe what data is accessed or utilized by the invention to perform certain functions

Network Descriptions {#network-descriptions}

If your invention relies on communication between devices (which most software does), the patent application should describe the types of networks involved and the types of communications that are exchanged over the network.

Examples of Networks:

  • The Internet
  • Local area networks (LAN, Wi-Fi)
  • Personal area networks (Bluetooth, NFC)
  • Cellular networks (4G/5G)
  • Satellite networks
  • Mesh networks
  • VPNs or secure tunnels

Describe how data travels across the network within your invention.

Example Network Flow:

  • A user opens a mobile app on a smartphone.
  • The mobile app sends authentication data to a backend server over the Internet.
  • The server retrieves data from a cloud database.
  • The server sends results back to the mobile app for rendering.
  • The mobile app displays updated interfaces and sends new user actions back to the server.

User Interface Descriptions {#user-interface}

Most software inventions involve generating and presenting user interfaces (UIs) to end-users. While the nature of these interactions can vary significantly across different inventions, interfaces are commonly used to collect input from users or to display results, outputs, or system-generated insights.

When drafting your patent application, you should provide a thorough description of the key user interfaces that showcase the functionality of your invention. Basic or routine interfaces—such as standard login screens or simple account pages—typically do not require much discussion. Instead, focus on the interfaces that illustrate the inventive aspects of your system, including precisely what data is collected and what information is displayed to the user.

Technical Improvement Descriptions {#technical-improvement}

When drafting your software patent application, it is also important to provide a description relating to any "technical improvements" or "improvements in technology" that can be attributed to the invention. For example, this description should clearly articulate how the invention provides a concrete technical improvement to computer functionality, data processing, networking, security, or system performance. Unlike patent applications for mechanical or physical inventions—where improvements may be self-evident—software patent applications should explicitly identify their technical contribution to help ensure they address patent eligibility requirements.

This is especially important in light of the 2014 Supreme Court decision in Alice v. CLS Bank, which clarified the patent-eligibility requirements under 35 U.S.C. 101. In general, this decision held that "abstract ideas" implemented on generic computers are not patent-eligible unless they provide a meaningful technical solution to a technical problem. Because of this, failing to describe your invention's technical improvements can lead to a non-provisional application being rejected as merely implementing an abstract idea or business concept.

To strengthen your patent application, your description should not focus on business benefits, organizational efficiencies, financial advantages, or human workflows. Instead, you must explain the technical nature of the problem and the technical mechanism through which your invention solves that problem. The goal is to demonstrate that your invention is rooted in computer technology and improves how computers, processors, or networked systems operate.

Examples of Technical Improvements

The particular technical improvements that apply to each invention can vary greatly. Below are some examples of technical improvements that you can consider fleshing out in your patent application.

  • Improvements to Computer Functionality
  • Reductions in Latency, Cost, Bandwidth, Memory, or CPU Usage
  • Faster or More Efficient Computation Than Conventional Techniques
  • Increased Accuracy or Reliability
  • Enhancements in Data Security or Network Security

Describe Technically Dense Subject Matter in Detail

If your invention involves complex or specialized technologies, you should describe that technical context comprehensively. Doing so can help demonstrate compliance with patent eligibility requirements and avoid rejections based on abstract ideas.

Conclusion {#conclusion}

Drafting a software patent application on your own can be a challenging task. But with a clear understanding of what must be included—and why—you can produce a strong, defensible provisional application.

If you want to simplify the process, consider using Idea2PatentAI. Our AI-powered drafting platform was specifically designed to help inventors draft comprehensive software patent applications in a fraction of the time it would take manually.

Article Information

By Idea2PatentAI Editorial Team

Reviewed by U.S. Patent Attorney (15+ years of experience)

Last updated: January 31, 2026

Editorial Standards

This article is prepared by the Idea2PatentAI editorial team and reviewed for technical accuracy by a U.S. Patent Attorney. It is provided for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this article or using Idea2PatentAI does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice regarding your specific situation, consult a qualified attorney.

We aim to keep our content current and accurate; however, laws, regulations, and USPTO practices can change. If you believe this page contains an error, please contact us. For more information about our content standards, visit our Editorial Policy.